The girl government first spoke up approximately Sarna in early 2015, following which she was moved to any other department in the Tata group. Then, simply before she resigned in November that yr, she recalled the tendencies that had led her to cease.
“even though I thoroughly loved the mission and duty of the Taj function (at IHCL) and had fantastic running courting with the relaxation of the employer, Mr Sarna’s irrelevant behaviour outweighed the positives of the work,”
the woman wrote in her letter to Mistry. “throughout my seven months employment at Taj i used to be subjected to repeated unwanted sexual advances from Mr Sarna. once I neglected or attempted to rebuff them the environment grew to become opposed.” ET has seen a duplicate of the November three, 2015, letter to Mistry.
The letter claims that she confided in senior Tata group officials inclusive of former GEC participants Madhu Kannan, NS Rajan who changed into also the leader human resources officer of the conglomerate and Ireena Vittal, unbiased director of IHC, about the matter. “I came to you in self assurance because I felt a huge quantity of loyalty to the residence of Tata,” she wrote in her mail to Mistry and went on to mention, ” i assumed i was a valued member of the Tata family and that discretion might help you to find a answer that is high-quality for me, Taj and the Tata organization.”